As long as we've already posted one FACTUAL comment concerning Nancy Johnson's views on WebCT (BTW, she was the instructor for a course on software engineering entitled, "TS5130 - System Development Theory & Practice," we thought we start providing further examples demonstrate what an unethical lying shyster, Capella's "Chief Counsel" Greg Thom really is by posting actual comments from ALL of the plaintiff's instructors (with the exception of the inarticulate Charlatan, Diane Stottlemyer who only wrote a total of four (4) incomplete sentences before Capella retaliated against the plaintiff and locked him out).
Before we begin our first series of FACTS concerning what Capella University, their shysters, and other scum bags have been intentionally lying about, we thought we would reprint one of shyster Greg Thom's lies to the media (ever heard of defamation shyster Greg Thom). BTW, stating someone is an ethical sleazy shyster, like Greg Thom is, isn't defamation when it's true! Anyway, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported that,
"Greg Thome [sic], general counsel [shyster] at Capella, says Mr. La Marca's suspension was for inappropriate behavior in online courses and had nothing to do with his accusations. The lawyer says students and instructors complained that Mr. La Marca was making improper comments in class.
"I would characterize it as personal attacks, questioning the intelligence of people," Mr. Thome [sic] said. "We had complaints from other learners saying, Look at what this guy is doing."
Of course, shyster Greg Thom, along with other unethical scum bags from Capella University knows that his statement was a blatant lie. As a result, here's the first of a series of comments that the plaintiff's instructors REALLY said (BTW, no students from the plaintiff's classes complained either).
On June 8, 2004 (just one month before Capella University illegally retaliated against the plaintiff), Dr. Nancy Johnson stated that,
" I have thoroughly enjoyed your postings, and appreciate all the energy you are investing in the discussions."
Then, on June 17, 2004 (just three weeks before Capella's illegal actions), Dr. Nancy Johnson told the plaintiff,
"You are a delight to have in the course."
Finally, on July 4, 2004 - the same week the Capella illegally locked the plaintiff out of his classes, Dr. Nancy Johnson commented on the Plaintiff's final project (which was turned in long after the quarter had ended due to incompetent design of WebCT) that she had,
"read the paper, and the tiny changes needed are so minor I want you to STOP working on it. The paper content is what matters, and what you have done is superb. . . After you have recovered, let's keep talking about where to submit your paper (or a shorter version of it) for publication."
Obviously, shyster Greg Thom is a blatant liar (we'll be posting more FACTS about the truth in the coming days). We're sure that readers will be interesting in learning that Greg Thom and shyster Priscilla McNulty have literally refused, for THREE years, to turn over all of the above (and many other) documents as required by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Be sure to come back tomorrow (July 12, 2007) to read what another instructor had to say about the plaintiff!
